EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen 7 3700X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9655P

2024

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 384 MB vs 32 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($10,811 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $10,482 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
✅Delivers 359.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $10,811 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (32 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 160,490).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9655P, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9655P moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655P better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9655P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9655P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 384 MB versus 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655P is the stronger fit. You are getting 615.5% better PassMark, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1100% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9655P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9655P comes in 3186.0% more expensive on MSRP at $10,811 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 359.3% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 14.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9655P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 384 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9655P vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9655P

The EPYC 9655P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,490 points. Launch price was $10,811.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9655P packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9655P has 88 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655P versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 2.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9655P (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9655P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9655P scores 160,490 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 151% lead for the EPYC 9655P. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	EPYC 9655P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	96 / 192+1100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+2%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.6 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)+1100%	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	160,490+616%	22,430
Geekbench 6 Multi	24,287	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9655P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9655P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 9655P supports 87.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9655P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9655P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9655P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 9655P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9655P) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	EPYC 9655P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+88%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655P) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: EPYC 9655P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9655P rivals Xeon 6979P.

Feature	EPYC 9655P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	—
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9655P was priced at $10811, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($10811 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $10482 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9655P delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 128.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9655P	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$10811	$329-97%
Performance per Dollar	14.8	68.2+361%
Release Date	2024	2019

Search EPYC 9655P on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.