EPYC 9734 vs Xeon w9-3595X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9734

112 Cores224 Thrd340 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w9-3595X

60 Cores120 Thrd385 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9734 vs Xeon w9-3595X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9734

112 / 224

102,286

+4.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Xeon w9-3595X

60 / 120

97,534

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9734 vs Xeon w9-3595X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9734 vs Xeon w9-3595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9734

2023

Why buy it

✅+4.9% higher PassMark.
✅+127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).
✅Draws 340W instead of 385W, a 45W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($9,600 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w9-3595X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,711 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $9,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $9,600 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (97,534 vs 102,286).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3595X better than EPYC 9734?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w9-3595X is ahead with a 26.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9734 pulls ahead with 4.9% better PassMark. EPYC 9734 also has the bigger cache pool with 127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9734 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.9% better PassMark, backed by 112 cores and 224 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w9-3595X is the better buy right now. Xeon w9-3595X comes in $3,711 cheaper on MSRP at $5,889 MSRP versus $9,600 MSRP, and it still gives you a 26.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9734 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 4.9% better PassMark. It is also 55.4% better value on MSRP (16.6 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3595X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9734 vs Xeon w9-3595X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9734

The EPYC 9734 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 112 cores and 224 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 102,286 points. Launch price was $9,600.

Xeon w9-3595X

The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9734 packs 112 cores / 224 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the EPYC 9734 has 52 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 9734 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9734 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9734 scores 102,286 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 4.8% lead for the EPYC 9734. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9734 vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.

Feature	EPYC 9734	Xeon w9-3595X
Cores / Threads	112 / 224+87%	60 / 120
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.8 GHz+60%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+128%	112.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Bergamo (2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	102,286+5%	97,534
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	130,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,118

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9734 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9734 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9734) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3595X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9734) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the EPYC 9734 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9734) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).

Feature	EPYC 9734	Xeon w9-3595X
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9734) vs true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: EPYC 9734 targets Data Center / High Density, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9734 rivals Xeon 6780E; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.

Feature	EPYC 9734	Xeon w9-3595X
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / High Density	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9734 was priced at $9600, while the Xeon w9-3595X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($9600 vs $5889), Xeon w9-3595X was $3711 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9734 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Xeon w9-3595X the 43.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9734	Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP	$9600	$5889-39%
Performance per Dollar	10.7	16.6+55%
Release Date	2023	2024

Search EPYC 9734 on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3595X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.