EPYC 9845 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
EPYC 9845
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9845
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Why is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX better than EPYC 9845?
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX outperforms the AMD EPYC 9845 by approximately 15% in aggregate benchmarks, making it the superior choice for high-end workstations. With 96 Zen 5 cores boosting up to 5.4 GHz and 384 MB of L3 cache, the 9995WX delivers exceptional single-thread performance (PassMark: 4,565) alongside massive multi-threaded capability (PassMark: 174,825).
The EPYC 9845 offers more cores (160 vs 96) but runs at significantly lower clock speeds (2.1-3.7 GHz), resulting in approximately 31% slower single-thread performance. Its advantage lies in 12-channel DDR5 memory support and dual-socket configurations for server environments requiring maximum core density.
For demanding workstation tasks like VFX, CAD, 3D rendering, and AI development, the Threadripper PRO 9995WX provides the optimal balance of core count and clock speed. The EPYC 9845 is better suited for data center deployments where massive parallelism across dual-socket systems outweighs the need for individual core performance, particularly in virtualization and cloud computing scenarios.
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($8,670) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($11,699) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+17%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($8,670) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($11,699) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9845 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
EPYC 9845
The EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 160 cores and 320 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 390 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 152,985 points. Launch price was $13,564.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 176,281 points. Launch price was $11,700.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9845 packs 160 cores / 320 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9845 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9845 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9845 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9845 scores 152,985 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX's 176,281 — a 14.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. L3 cache: 320 MB (total) on the EPYC 9845 vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 160 / 320+67% | 96 / 192 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz+46% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 320 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 152,985 | 176,281+15% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 180,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 30,170 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9845 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9845) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9845) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9845) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9845 targets Data Center / AI Training, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX targets High-end Workstation / AI Rendering. Direct competitor: EPYC 9845 rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / AI Training | High-end Workstation / AI Rendering |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9845 launched at $13564 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX debuted at $11699. At current prices ($8670 vs $11699), the EPYC 9845 is $3029 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9845 delivers 17.6 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — making the EPYC 9845 the 15.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $13564 | $11699-14% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8670-26% | $11699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6+17% | 15.1 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9845 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
