EPYC 9845 vs EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9845
EPYC 9575F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9845
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9575F
Why is EPYC 9845 better than EPYC 9575F?
The AMD EPYC 9845 edges out the EPYC 9575F in multi-threaded workloads with a 3.6% higher aggregate performance score thanks to its massive 160 cores and 320 threads compared to the 9575F's 64 cores and 128 threads. With a PassMark score of 152,985 versus 147,606, the 9845 excels in heavily parallelized enterprise applications while consuming 2.6% less power.
The EPYC 9575F counters with significantly stronger single-threaded performance, achieving a 4,160 PassMark single-thread rating compared to 3,144 for the 9845. Its higher 5.0 GHz boost clock (vs 3.7 GHz) makes it better suited for workloads that depend on per-core speed rather than core count. Both Zen 5 Turin processors utilize the SP5 socket with 390-400W TDP.
Choose the EPYC 9845 for data centers running massively parallel workloads like containerized applications, AI inference, or high-density cloud computing. The EPYC 9575F is better for latency-sensitive enterprise applications requiring maximum single-thread performance, such as database servers or financial trading platforms.
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9845 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($8,670) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,238) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9845 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+10%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($8,670) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($9,238) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9845 and EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9845
The EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 160 cores and 320 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 390 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 152,985 points. Launch price was $13,564.
EPYC 9575F
The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9845 packs 160 cores / 320 threads, while the EPYC 9575F offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9845 has 96 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9845 versus 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F — a 29.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9575F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 3 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9845 scores 152,985 against the EPYC 9575F's 147,718 — a 3.5% lead for the EPYC 9845. L3 cache: 320 MB (total) on the EPYC 9845 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 160 / 320+150% | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 320 MB (total)+25% | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 152,985+4% | 147,718 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 29,308 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9845) and SP5 (EPYC 9575F).
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9845 targets Data Center / AI Training, EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency. Direct competitor: EPYC 9845 rivals Xeon 6972P; EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / AI Training | Data Center / High Frequency |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9845 launched at $13564 MSRP, while the EPYC 9575F debuted at $11791. At current prices ($8670 vs $9238), the EPYC 9845 is $568 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9845 delivers 17.6 pts/$ vs 16.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 9575F — making the EPYC 9845 the 9.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $13564 | $11791-13% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8670-6% | $9238 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6+10% | 16.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9845 and EPYC 9575F
