FirePro 2270 vs Quadro FX 380 LP Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2270 vs Quadro FX 380 LP FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2270 vs Quadro FX 380 LP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2270
2014Why buy it
- β Costs $20 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- β Delivers 11.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- β2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β45% higher power demand at 274W vs 189W.
Quadro FX 380 LP
2008Why buy it
- β Draws 189W instead of 274W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β13.4% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2270 vs Quadro FX 380 LP Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2270
The FirePro 2270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 142 points.

Quadro FX 380 LP
The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 2270 scores 142 and the Quadro FX 380 LP reaches 145 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2270 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 380 LP uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 2270) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 2270) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP).
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 142 | 145+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+753% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+460% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2270 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 380 LP carries 512 MB. FirePro 2270 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2270 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380 LP. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 2270) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 380 LP) β the FirePro 2270 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2270 draws 274W versus the Quadro FX 380 LP's 189W β a 36.7% difference. The Quadro FX 380 LP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2270) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 189W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | β |
| Height | 69mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 60Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.8+60% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2270 came in at $149, while the Quadro FX 380 LP launched at $169. On MSRP, FirePro 2270 was 11.8% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (FirePro 2270) vs 0.9 (Quadro FX 380 LP) β the FirePro 2270 offers 11.1% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2270 (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro FX 380 LP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-12% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0+11% | 0.9 |
| Codename | Tahiti | GT200B |
| Release | January 18 2014 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #423 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















