FirePro 2270 vs Radeon R5 220

FirePro 2270

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 220

2013Core: 947 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 2270 vs Radeon R5 220 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2270 vs Radeon R5 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2270

2014

Why buy it

  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 325.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 220

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $114 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Delivers 340.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 220 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (147 vs 142), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 2270 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 220 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $114 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 340.7% (4.2 vs 1.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 220 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 2270 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 2270 vs Radeon R5 220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 2270

The FirePro 2270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 142 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 220

The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 2270 scores 142 and the Radeon R5 220 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2270 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 220 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 2270) vs 2,560 (Radeon R5 220). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 2270) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220).

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon R5 220
G3D Mark Score
142
147+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2560+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS+39%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
128
160+25%
L1 Cache
512 KB
640 KB+25%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon R5 220
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2270 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 220. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro 2270) vs 1 MB (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon R5 220
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (FirePro 2270) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 220). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon R5 220
DirectX
11
11.2+2%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2270) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 220). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon R5 220
Encoder
UVD 2.3
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 2.3
UVD 3.1
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2270 draws 274W versus the Radeon R5 220's 275W — a 0.4% difference. The FirePro 2270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2270) vs 350W (Radeon R5 220). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon R5 220
TDP
274W
275W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
60°C
Perf/Watt
0.5
0.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2270 came in at $149, while the Radeon R5 220 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon R5 220 was 76.5% cheaper ($114 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (FirePro 2270) vs 4.2 (Radeon R5 220) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 320% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2270 (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon R5 220
MSRP
$149
$35-77%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
4.2+320%
Codename
Tahiti
Hawaii
Release
January 18 2014
November 5 2013
Ranking
#423
#316

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.