Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro 2270 vs Radeon HD 6320

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro 2270

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6320

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro 2270 vs Radeon HD 6320 Performance Spectrum

FirePro 2270
1 GB 274
142
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 2350
brand logoRadeon HD 6250
brand logoRadeon HD 4270
brand logoRadeon HD 4250
brand logoRadeon R9 270X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon HD 6320
0.5 GB 186
147
+3.5%
brand logoRadeon HD 3200
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 4250
brand logoRadeon HD 7290
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON X1800
brand logoRadeon R9 270X
brand logoRadeon RX 6500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 2270 vs Radeon HD 6320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 2270

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    396.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
  • ❌47.3% higher power demand at 274W vs 186W.
  • ❌16900% longer card at 170mm vs 1mm.

Radeon HD 6320

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 414.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 186W instead of 274W, a 88W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 1mm instead of 170mm, a 169mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6320 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (147 vs 142), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 2270 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6320 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $119 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 414.2% (4.9 vs 1.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6320 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 2270 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 2270 vs Radeon HD 6320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 2270

The FirePro 2270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 142 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6320

The Radeon HD 6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 2270 scores 142 and the Radeon HD 6320 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2270 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6320 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 2270) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 2270) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320).

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon HD 6320
G3D Mark Score
142
147+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048+60%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+81%
1.92 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+60%
80
L1 Cache
512 KB+60%
320 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon HD 6320
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2270 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6320 carries 512 MB. FirePro 2270 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2270 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6320. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 2270) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6320) — the FirePro 2270 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon HD 6320
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (FirePro 2270) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon HD 6320
DirectX
11
11.2+2%
OpenGL
4.4
4.5+2%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2270) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6320). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2270) vs H.264,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6320).

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon HD 6320
Encoder
UVD 2.3
UVD 3
Decoder
UVD 2.3
UVD 3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2270 draws 274W versus the Radeon HD 6320's 186W — a 38.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2270) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon HD 6320
TDP
274W
186W-32%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
170mm
1mm
Height
69mm
—
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
60°C
—
Perf/Watt
0.5
0.8+60%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 2270 came in at $149, while the Radeon HD 6320 launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6320 was 79.9% cheaper ($119 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (FirePro 2270) vs 4.9 (Radeon HD 6320) — the Radeon HD 6320 offers 390% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 2270 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro 2270Radeon HD 6320
MSRP
$149
$30-80%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
4.9+390%
Codename
Tahiti
Cayman
Release
January 18 2014
December 1 2011
Ranking
#423
#598
Search FirePro 2270 on AmazonSearch Radeon HD 6320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.