
FirePro 2270

Quadro NVS 420
FirePro 2270 vs Quadro NVS 420 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 2270 vs Quadro NVS 420 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 2270 vs Quadro NVS 420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 2270
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌174% higher power demand at 274W vs 100W.
Quadro NVS 420
2018Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅FirePro 2270 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro NVS 420 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 274W, a 174W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 170mm, a 10mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 2270 vs Quadro NVS 420 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 2270
The FirePro 2270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 142 points.

Quadro NVS 420
The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 2270 scores 142 and the Quadro NVS 420 reaches 137 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 2270 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro NVS 420 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 2270) vs 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 2270) vs 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 420).
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 142+4% | 137 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS | 7.589 TFLOPS+118% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 864 KB+69% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2270 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro NVS 420 carries 4 GB. Quadro NVS 420 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 2270 and 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 420. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro 2270) vs 2 MB (Quadro NVS 420) — the Quadro NVS 420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (FirePro 2270) vs 10_0 (Quadro NVS 420). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11+10% | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2270) vs PureVideo HD (Quadro NVS 420). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo HD.
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2270 draws 274W versus the Quadro NVS 420's 100W — a 93% difference. The Quadro NVS 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2270) vs 350W (Quadro NVS 420). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 100W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | 160mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 1.4+180% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 2270 came in at $149, while the Quadro NVS 420 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro NVS 420 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (FirePro 2270) vs Infinity (Quadro NVS 420) — the Quadro NVS 420 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro NVS 420 (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro 2270 | Quadro NVS 420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tahiti | GP104 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #423 | #266 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














