FirePro 3D V7750 vs Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V7750 vs Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 3D V7750 vs Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V7750

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
✅Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro 3D V7750 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌3814.3% higher power demand at 274W vs 7W.

Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 274W, a 267W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro 3D V7750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (545 vs 540), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro 3D V7750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro 3D V7750 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro 3D V7750 vs Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V7750

The FirePro 3D V7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 545 points.

Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 540 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V7750 scores 545 and the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU reaches 540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	FirePro 3D V7750	Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
G3D Mark Score	545	540
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V7750	Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V7750 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU carries 0 MB. FirePro 3D V7750 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V7750 and System on the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU.

Feature	FirePro 3D V7750	Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V7750 draws 274W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU's 7W — a 190% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7750) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	FirePro 3D V7750	Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
TDP	274W	7W-97%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	234mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.0	77.1+3755%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V7750 came in at $799, while the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU launched at $0. On MSRP, Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU was 100+% cheaper ($799 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (FirePro 3D V7750) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU (2018 vs 2014).

Feature	FirePro 3D V7750	Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
MSRP	$799	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.7	Infinity
Codename	Tahiti	—
Release	January 18 2014	December 6 2018
Ranking	#423	#916

Search FirePro 3D V7750 on Amazon

Search Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.