G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V8750 vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 3D V8750 vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V8750

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,272 vs 5,319).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2898.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,799 MSRPvs$60 MSRP

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

✅+318.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,739 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12437.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 6300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 318.2% in PassMark G3D (5,319 vs 1,272), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while FirePro 3D V8750 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, and 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,739 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $1,799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 12437.8% (88.7 vs 0.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro 3D V8750 vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V8750

The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 3D V8750 scores 1,272 versus the Radeon RX 6300's 5,319 — the Radeon RX 6300 leads by 318.2%. The FirePro 3D V8750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300).

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	Radeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score	1,272	5,319+318%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2048+167%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.482 TFLOPS	3.686 TFLOPS+6%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro 3D V8750 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	Radeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8750 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 6300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8750 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	Radeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit+100%	32-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	Radeon RX 6300
DirectX	10.1	12_2+19%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: UVD 2 vs VCN 3.0.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	Radeon RX 6300
Encoder	UVD 2	VCN 3.0
Decoder	UVD 2	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8750 draws 274W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 154.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 254mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	Radeon RX 6300
TDP	274W	35W-87%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	254mm	160mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.6	152.0+3204%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V8750 came in at $1799, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 96.7% cheaper ($1739 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 12571.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300 (2022 vs 2014).

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	Radeon RX 6300
MSRP	$1799	$60-97%
Performance per Dollar	0.7	88.7+12571%
Codename	Tahiti	Navi 24
Release	January 18 2014	January 4 2022
Ranking	#423	#379

Search FirePro 3D V8750 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.