
FirePro 3D V9800

Radeon R9 M380
FirePro 3D V9800 vs Radeon R9 M380 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V9800 vs Radeon R9 M380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro 3D V9800 vs Radeon R9 M380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V9800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1066.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1041.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V9800 vs Radeon R9 M380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V9800
The FirePro 3D V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,812 points.

Radeon R9 M380
The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V9800 scores 2,812 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,812+2% | 2,752 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+67% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+21% | 1.536 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V9800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M380. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M380) — the FirePro 3D V9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_0)+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro 3D V9800) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M380).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V9800 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | 85-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 18.7 | 36.7+96% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V9800 came in at $3499, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M380 was 91.4% cheaper ($3199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro 3D V9800) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Radeon R9 M380 offers 1050% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M380 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V9800 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $300-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 9.2+1050% |
| Codename | Cayman | Strato |
| Release | May 24 2011 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #656 | #607 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














