
FirePro RG220 vs GeForce 605

FirePro RG220
Popular choices:

GeForce 605
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 605
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro RG220 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 605.
| Insight | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 605 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro RG220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro RG220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 52.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 605 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+52.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro RG220 and GeForce 605

FirePro RG220
The FirePro RG220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $1,099.

GeForce 605
The GeForce 605 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro RG220 scores 335 and the GeForce 605 reaches 330 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro RG220 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 605 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro RG220) vs 384 (GeForce 605). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro RG220) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce 605).
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 605 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 335+2% | 330 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS+83% | 0.6927 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+500% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 605 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro RG220) vs 256 KB (GeForce 605) — the FirePro RG220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 605 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro RG220) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 605). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 605 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 (11_0)+19% |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro RG220) vs None (GeForce 605). Decoder: None vs VP5.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 605 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro RG220 draws 150W versus the GeForce 605's 65W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro RG220) vs 250W (GeForce 605). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 605 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 65W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2 | 5.1+132% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro RG220 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 605 launched at $30 and now averages $30. The FirePro RG220 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.8 (FirePro RG220) vs 11.0 (GeForce 605) — the FirePro RG220 offers 52.7% better value. The FirePro RG220 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro RG220 | GeForce 605 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $30 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-33% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.8+53% | 11.0 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GK107 |
| Release | February 25 2013 | June 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #619 | #837 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











