FirePro V3900
GeForce RTX 4070
FirePro V3900 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V3900 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro V3900 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V3900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $480 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 304mm, a 136mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (631 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+4166.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 747.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
- ❌81% longer card at 304mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V3900 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro V3900
The FirePro V3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 631 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro V3900 scores 631 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 4166.1%. The FirePro V3900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V3900) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V3900) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | FirePro V3900 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 631 | 26,919+4166% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 5888+360% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+1471% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 184+130% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 5.8 MB+1771% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 36 MB+7100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro V3900 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V3900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro V3900 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V3900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3900 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V3900) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V3900 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 12 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 36 MB+7100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro V3900) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro V3900 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12.2+11% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V3900) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (FirePro V3900) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | FirePro V3900 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V3900 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The FirePro V3900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3900) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro V3900 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 304mm |
| Height | 69mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 1-67% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.2 | 134.6+3105% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V3900 came in at $119, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, FirePro V3900 was 80.1% cheaper ($480 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.3 (FirePro V3900) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 747.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V3900 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $119-80% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3 | 44.9+747% |
| Codename | Cayman | AD104 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #656 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V3900 and GeForce RTX 4070
