FirePro V3900 vs Radeon HD 5600/5700

FirePro V3900

2011Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5600/5700

2010Boost: 880 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon HD 5600/5700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon HD 5600/5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V3900

2011

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 20.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $119 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon HD 5600/5700

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
  • Delivers 17.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro V3900 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (631 vs 615), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V3900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 5600/5700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $119, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 17.2% (6.2 vs 5.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 5600/5700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V3900 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon HD 5600/5700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V3900

The FirePro V3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 631 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 5600/5700

The Radeon HD 5600/5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $369.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V3900 scores 631 and the Radeon HD 5600/5700 reaches 615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V3900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 5600/5700 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V3900) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 5600/5700). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V3900) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5600/5700).

FeatureFirePro V3900Radeon HD 5600/5700
G3D Mark Score
631+3%
615
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TeraScale 3
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1280
1536+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.856 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS+46%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
96+20%
L1 Cache
320 KB+67%
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V3900Radeon HD 5600/5700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V3900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5600/5700 carries 512 MB. FirePro V3900 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3900 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5600/5700.

FeatureFirePro V3900Radeon HD 5600/5700
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro V3900) vs 11 (11_0) (Radeon HD 5600/5700). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro V3900Radeon HD 5600/5700
DirectX
11.0
11 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V3900) vs No (Radeon HD 5600/5700). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (FirePro V3900) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 5600/5700).

FeatureFirePro V3900Radeon HD 5600/5700
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
UVD 3.0
UVD 2.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V3900 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 5600/5700's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro V3900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3900) vs 350W (Radeon HD 5600/5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.

FeatureFirePro V3900Radeon HD 5600/5700
TDP
150W-40%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
168mm
168mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
4.2+68%
2.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V3900 came in at $119, while the Radeon HD 5600/5700 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5600/5700 was 16.8% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.3 (FirePro V3900) vs 6.2 (Radeon HD 5600/5700) — the Radeon HD 5600/5700 offers 17% better value. The newer card here is FirePro V3900 (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro V3900Radeon HD 5600/5700
MSRP
$119
$99-17%
Performance per Dollar
5.3
6.2+17%
Codename
Cayman
Cayman
Release
May 24 2011
December 14 2010
Ranking
#656
#596

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.