FirePro V3900 vs Radeon R7 A360

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon R7 A360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon R7 A360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V3900

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
9.2% HIGHER MSRP
$119 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.

Radeon R7 A360

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro V3900 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (631 vs 616), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V3900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A360 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $119, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 6.6% (5.7 vs 5.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A360 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V3900 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V3900 vs Radeon R7 A360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V3900

The FirePro V3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 631 points.

Radeon R7 A360

The Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 616 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V3900 scores 631 and the Radeon R7 A360 reaches 616 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V3900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon R7 A360 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V3900) vs 768 (Radeon R7 A360). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V3900) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A360).

Feature	FirePro V3900	Radeon R7 A360
G3D Mark Score	631+2%	616
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280+67%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.856 TFLOPS+15%	1.613 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+67%	48
L1 Cache	320 KB+67%	192 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V3900	Radeon R7 A360
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V3900 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A360 carries 512 MB. FirePro V3900 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3900 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A360. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V3900) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A360) — the FirePro V3900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro V3900	Radeon R7 A360
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V3900 draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 A360's 80W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon R7 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3900) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	FirePro V3900	Radeon R7 A360
TDP	150W	80W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	4.2	7.7+83%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V3900 came in at $119, while the Radeon R7 A360 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A360 was 8.4% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.3 (FirePro V3900) vs 5.7 (Radeon R7 A360) — the Radeon R7 A360 offers 7.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A360 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro V3900	Radeon R7 A360
MSRP	$119	$109-8%
Performance per Dollar	5.3	5.7+8%
Codename	Cayman	Tobago
Release	May 24 2011	June 18 2015
Ranking	#656	#576

Search FirePro V3900 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A360 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.