
FirePro V5700 vs FirePro 3D V3800

FirePro V5700
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V3800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V5700 is positioned at rank 368 and the FirePro 3D V3800 is on rank 238, so the FirePro 3D V3800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5700
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V3800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V5700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro V5700 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V3800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V3800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $12 (vs $20), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 69.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro V5700 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+69.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($12) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V5700 and FirePro 3D V3800

FirePro V5700
The FirePro V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 465 points.

FirePro 3D V3800
The FirePro 3D V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V5700 scores 465 and the FirePro 3D V3800 reaches 472 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V5700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the FirePro 3D V3800 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V5700) vs 800 (FirePro 3D V3800). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V5700) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3800).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 465 | 472+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+60% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+68% | 1.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+300% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V5700 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V3800 has 512 MB. The FirePro V5700 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro V5700) vs 256 KB (FirePro 3D V3800) — the FirePro V5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro V5700) vs 11.2 (FirePro 3D V3800). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2+11% |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V5700) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V3800). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro V5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3800).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V5700 draws 150W versus the FirePro 3D V3800's 74W — a 67.9% difference. The FirePro 3D V3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V5700) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V3800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 65°C.
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 74W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 64mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1 | 6.4+106% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro V5700 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro 3D V3800 launched at $129 and now averages $12. The FirePro 3D V3800 costs 40% less ($8 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.3 (FirePro V5700) vs 39.3 (FirePro 3D V3800) — the FirePro 3D V3800 offers 68.7% better value. The FirePro V5700 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro V5700 | FirePro 3D V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $129-78% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $12-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3 | 39.3+69% |
| Codename | Cayman | Juniper |
| Release | May 24 2011 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #656 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











