FirePro W4100
VS
GeForce 940MX

FirePro W4100 vs GeForce 940MX

FirePro W4100

2014Core: 630 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 940MX

2016Core: 795 MHzBoost: 861 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W4100 is positioned at rank 160 and the GeForce 940MX is on rank 300, so the FirePro W4100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4100

#74
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095
93%
#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
87%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
86%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
85%
#145
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1808%
#160
FirePro W4100
MSRP: $183|Avg: $183
100%
#166
FirePro W5100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
92%
#167
Radeon Pro WX 4170
MSRP: $400|Avg: $120
88%
#168
FirePro W4300
MSRP: $379|Avg: $50
88%
#169
Quadro K2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
88%
#173
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $86
86%
#175
Radeon Pro 560
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 940MX

#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
99%
#290
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
719%
#292
652%
#293
650%
#297
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
592%
#298
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
587%
#300
GeForce 940MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#301
GeForce MX130
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
100%
#302
Arc Graphics 130V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
100%
#303
Radeon R5 430
MSRP: $59|Avg: $50
100%
#305
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
99%
#307
GeForce MX450
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
99%
#308
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
98%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
97%
#312
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
94%
#314
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
94%
#315
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 940MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightFirePro W4100GeForce 940MX
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 940MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 940MX holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $183), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 269.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro W4100GeForce 940MX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+269.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($183)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W4100 and GeForce 940MX

AMD

FirePro W4100

The FirePro W4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 630 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,496 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 940MX

The GeForce 940MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,509 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4100 scores 1,496 and the GeForce 940MX reaches 1,509 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 940MX uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W4100) vs 512 (GeForce 940MX). Raw compute: 0.6451 TFLOPS (FirePro W4100) vs 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 940MX).

FeatureFirePro W4100GeForce 940MX
G3D Mark Score
1,496
1,509
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6451 TFLOPS
0.8817 TFLOPS+37%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W4100GeForce 940MX
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 940MX has 512 MB. The FirePro W4100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4100) vs 1 MB (GeForce 940MX) — the GeForce 940MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W4100GeForce 940MX
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4100) vs 11.0 (GeForce 940MX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureFirePro W4100GeForce 940MX
DirectX
12+9%
11.0
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W4100) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 940MX). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W4100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce 940MX).

FeatureFirePro W4100GeForce 940MX
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4100 draws 50W versus the GeForce 940MX's 23W — a 74% difference. The GeForce 940MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4100) vs 350W (GeForce 940MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 171mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro W4100GeForce 940MX
TDP
50W
23W-54%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
171mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
90°C
75°C-17%
Perf/Watt
29.9
65.6+119%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W4100 launched at $183 MSRP and currently averages $183, while the GeForce 940MX launched at $100 and now averages $50. The GeForce 940MX costs 72.7% less ($133 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (FirePro W4100) vs 30.2 (GeForce 940MX) — the GeForce 940MX offers 268.3% better value. The GeForce 940MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W4100GeForce 940MX
MSRP
$183
$100-45%
Avg Price (30d)
$183
$50-73%
Performance per Dollar
8.2
30.2+268%
Codename
Cape Verde
GM107
Release
August 13 2014
June 28 2016
Ranking
#766
#764