
FirePro W4100
Popular choices:

GeForce 940MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W4100 is positioned at rank 160 and the GeForce 940MX is on rank 300, so the FirePro W4100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4100
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 940MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 940MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W4100 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 940MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 940MX holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $183), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 269.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W4100 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+269.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($183) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W4100 and GeForce 940MX

FirePro W4100
The FirePro W4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 630 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,496 points.

GeForce 940MX
The GeForce 940MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,509 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W4100 scores 1,496 and the GeForce 940MX reaches 1,509 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 940MX uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W4100) vs 512 (GeForce 940MX). Raw compute: 0.6451 TFLOPS (FirePro W4100) vs 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 940MX).
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,496 | 1,509 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6451 TFLOPS | 0.8817 TFLOPS+37% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W4100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 940MX has 512 MB. The FirePro W4100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4100) vs 1 MB (GeForce 940MX) — the GeForce 940MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4100) vs 11.0 (GeForce 940MX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W4100) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 940MX). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W4100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce 940MX).
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4100 draws 50W versus the GeForce 940MX's 23W — a 74% difference. The GeForce 940MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4100) vs 350W (GeForce 940MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 171mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 23W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 171mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75°C-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 29.9 | 65.6+119% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W4100 launched at $183 MSRP and currently averages $183, while the GeForce 940MX launched at $100 and now averages $50. The GeForce 940MX costs 72.7% less ($133 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (FirePro W4100) vs 30.2 (GeForce 940MX) — the GeForce 940MX offers 268.3% better value. The GeForce 940MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce 940MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $183 | $100-45% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $183 | $50-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 30.2+268% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GM107 |
| Release | August 13 2014 | June 28 2016 |
| Ranking | #766 | #764 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















