FirePro W4100
VS
Radeon R9 M365X

FirePro W4100 vs Radeon R9 M365X

FirePro W4100

2014Core: 630 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M365X

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W4100 is positioned at rank 160 and the Radeon R9 M365X is on rank 445, so the FirePro W4100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4100

#74
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095
93%
#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
87%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
86%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
85%
#145
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1808%
#160
FirePro W4100
MSRP: $183|Avg: $183
100%
#166
FirePro W5100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
92%
#167
Radeon Pro WX 4170
MSRP: $400|Avg: $120
88%
#168
FirePro W4300
MSRP: $379|Avg: $50
88%
#169
Quadro K2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
88%
#173
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $86
86%
#175
Radeon Pro 560
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M365X

#435
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1831%
#437
1660%
#438
1655%
#442
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1505%
#443
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1495%
#445
Radeon R9 M365X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
100%
#446
GeForce 7800 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
99%
#447
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#448
Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP: $200|Avg: $30
98%
#449
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
98%
#450
Radeon R5 M435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#451
Radeon E8860
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
95%
#452
Radeon R7 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
94%
#453
Radeon HD 7650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
94%
#454
GeForce 820A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
94%
#455
94%
#456
Radeon HD 7850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
93%
#457
93%
#458
92%
#459
Radeon HD 8450G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#460
Radeon R9 M275X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W4100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M365X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightFirePro W4100Radeon R9 M365X
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 M365X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M365X holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $183), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 262.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro W4100Radeon R9 M365X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+262.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($183)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W4100 and Radeon R9 M365X

AMD

FirePro W4100

The FirePro W4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 630 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,496 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M365X

The Radeon R9 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,482 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4100 scores 1,496 and the Radeon R9 M365X reaches 1,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W4100) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M365X). Raw compute: 0.6451 TFLOPS (FirePro W4100) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M365X).

FeatureFirePro W4100Radeon R9 M365X
G3D Mark Score
1,496
1,482
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6451 TFLOPS
1.184 TFLOPS+84%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB
160 KB+25%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W4100Radeon R9 M365X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M365X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M365X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureFirePro W4100Radeon R9 M365X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4100 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M365X's 75W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4100) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M365X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFirePro W4100Radeon R9 M365X
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
171mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
29.9+51%
19.8
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W4100 launched at $183 MSRP and currently averages $183, while the Radeon R9 M365X launched at $250 and now averages $50. The Radeon R9 M365X costs 72.7% less ($133 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (FirePro W4100) vs 29.6 (Radeon R9 M365X) — the Radeon R9 M365X offers 261% better value. The Radeon R9 M365X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W4100Radeon R9 M365X
MSRP
$183-27%
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$183
$50-73%
Performance per Dollar
8.2
29.6+261%
Codename
Cape Verde
Tropo
Release
August 13 2014
May 5 2015
Ranking
#766
#769