FirePro W4100 vs GRID M10-1B

FirePro W4100

2014Core: 630 MHz
VS

GRID M10-1B

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

FirePro W4100 vs GRID M10-1B Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4100 vs GRID M10-1B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4100

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,317 less on MSRP ($183 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1258.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($183 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 17000% longer card at 171mm vs 1mm.

GRID M10-1B

2015

Why buy it

  • Measures 1mm instead of 171mm, a 170mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1266.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$183 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
  • 350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M10-1B is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,504 vs 1,496), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W4100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,317 cheaper on MSRP at $183 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1258.9% (8.2 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID M10-1B still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro W4100 vs GRID M10-1B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W4100

The FirePro W4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 630 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,496 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-1B

The GRID M10-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,504 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4100 scores 1,496 and the GRID M10-1B reaches 1,504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M10-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W4100) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1B). Raw compute: 0.6451 TFLOPS (FirePro W4100) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1B).

FeatureFirePro W4100GRID M10-1B
G3D Mark Score
1,496
1,504
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
2048+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6451 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+648%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L1 Cache
128 KB
768 KB+500%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W4100GRID M10-1B
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-1B carries 512 MB. FirePro W4100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4100 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-1B. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W4100) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1B) — the GRID M10-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W4100GRID M10-1B
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W4100) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1B). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro W4100GRID M10-1B
DirectX
12
12_1
Max Displays
4
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4100 draws 50W versus the GRID M10-1B's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The FirePro W4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4100) vs 350W (GRID M10-1B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 171mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro W4100GRID M10-1B
TDP
50W-78%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
171mm
1mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
29.9+346%
6.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W4100 came in at $183, while the GRID M10-1B launched at $2500. On MSRP, FirePro W4100 was 92.7% cheaper ($2317 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (FirePro W4100) vs 0.6 (GRID M10-1B) — the FirePro W4100 offers 1266.7% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-1B (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W4100GRID M10-1B
MSRP
$183-93%
$2500
Performance per Dollar
8.2+1267%
0.6
Codename
Cape Verde
GM204
Release
August 13 2014
August 30 2015
Ranking
#766
#525

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.