
FirePro W4100

GeForce GTX 285
FirePro W4100 vs GeForce GTX 285 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W4100 vs GeForce GTX 285 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W4100 vs GeForce GTX 285: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W4100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $176 less on MSRP ($183 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 99% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($183 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 204W, a 154W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTX 285
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌96.2% HIGHER MSRP$359 MSRPvs$183 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($359 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
- ❌308% higher power demand at 204W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W4100 vs GeForce GTX 285 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W4100
The FirePro W4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 630 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,496 points.

GeForce GTX 285
The GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 23 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 648 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $359.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W4100 scores 1,496 and the GeForce GTX 285 reaches 1,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 285 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W4100) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 285). Raw compute: 0.6451 TFLOPS (FirePro W4100) vs 0.7085 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 285).
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce GTX 285 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,496+1% | 1,475 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+113% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6451 TFLOPS | 0.7085 TFLOPS+10% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 285 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W4100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce GTX 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W4100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 285 carries 1 GB. FirePro W4100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4100 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 285.
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce GTX 285 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W4100) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 285).
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce GTX 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | — |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W4100 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 285's 204W — a 121.3% difference. The FirePro W4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4100) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 285). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce GTX 285 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-75% | 204W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 171mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.9+315% | 7.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W4100 came in at $183, while the GeForce GTX 285 launched at $359. On MSRP, FirePro W4100 was 49% cheaper ($176 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (FirePro W4100) vs 4.1 (GeForce GTX 285) — the FirePro W4100 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W4100 (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | FirePro W4100 | GeForce GTX 285 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $183-49% | $359 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+100% | 4.1 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GT200B |
| Release | August 13 2014 | December 23 2008 |
| Ranking | #766 | #771 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















