FirePro W4100 vs Quadro 4000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4100 vs Quadro 4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W4100 vs Quadro 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4100

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,016 less on MSRP ($183 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 564.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($183 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 142W, a 92W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 4000

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
555.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,199 MSRPvs$183 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
❌184% higher power demand at 142W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro W4100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (1,496 vs 1,475), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W4100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro W4100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,016 cheaper on MSRP at $183 vs $1,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 564.5% (8.2 vs 1.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro W4100 vs Quadro 4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W4100

The FirePro W4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 630 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,496 points.

Quadro 4000

The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4100 scores 1,496 and the Quadro 4000 reaches 1,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 4000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W4100) vs 256 (Quadro 4000). Raw compute: 0.6451 TFLOPS (FirePro W4100) vs 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000).

Feature	FirePro W4100	Quadro 4000
G3D Mark Score	1,496+1%	1,475
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512+100%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6451 TFLOPS+33%	0.4864 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W4100	Quadro 4000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4100 and 64-bit on the Quadro 4000. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W4100) vs 512 KB (Quadro 4000) — the Quadro 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W4100	Quadro 4000
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4100 draws 50W versus the Quadro 4000's 142W — a 95.8% difference. The FirePro W4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4100) vs 350W (Quadro 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro W4100	Quadro 4000
TDP	50W-65%	142W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	171mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	29.9+188%	10.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W4100 came in at $183, while the Quadro 4000 launched at $1199. On MSRP, FirePro W4100 was 84.7% cheaper ($1016 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (FirePro W4100) vs 1.2 (Quadro 4000) — the FirePro W4100 offers 583.3% better value. The newer card here is FirePro W4100 (2014 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro W4100	Quadro 4000
MSRP	$183-85%	$1199
Performance per Dollar	8.2+583%	1.2
Codename	Cape Verde	GF100
Release	August 13 2014	November 2 2010
Ranking	#766	#770

Search FirePro W4100 on Amazon

Search Quadro 4000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.