FirePro W4100 vs Radeon 540

FirePro W4100

2014Core: 630 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 540

2017Core: 1183 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W4100 vs Radeon 540 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W4100 vs Radeon 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W4100

2014

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 84.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $183 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($183 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon 540

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $84 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
  • Delivers 79.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W4100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (1,496 vs 1,452), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W4100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 540 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $84 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $183, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 79.4% (14.7 vs 8.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon 540 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W4100 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W4100 vs Radeon 540 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W4100

The FirePro W4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 630 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,496 points.

AMD

Radeon 540

The Radeon 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W4100 scores 1,496 and the Radeon 540 reaches 1,452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W4100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 540 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W4100) vs 384 (Radeon 540). Raw compute: 0.6451 TFLOPS (FirePro W4100) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon 540).

FeatureFirePro W4100Radeon 540
G3D Mark Score
1,496+3%
1,452
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6451 TFLOPS
0.9085 TFLOPS+41%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W4100Radeon 540
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W4100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 540 carries 512 MB. FirePro W4100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W4100 and 64-bit on the Radeon 540. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W4100) vs 512 KB (Radeon 540) — the Radeon 540 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W4100Radeon 540
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W4100 draws 50W versus the Radeon 540's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W4100) vs 350W (Radeon 540). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureFirePro W4100Radeon 540
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
171mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
29.9+3%
29.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W4100 came in at $183, while the Radeon 540 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon 540 was 45.9% cheaper ($84 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (FirePro W4100) vs 14.7 (Radeon 540) — the Radeon 540 offers 79.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 540 (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W4100Radeon 540
MSRP
$183
$99-46%
Performance per Dollar
8.2
14.7+79%
Codename
Cape Verde
Lexa
Release
August 13 2014
April 20 2017
Ranking
#766
#773

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.