
FirePro W9100 vs GeForce GTX 1060

FirePro W9100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W9100 is positioned at rank #299 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 29.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W9100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-29.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+29.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (275mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $200), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 333% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+333%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9100 and GeForce GTX 1060

FirePro W9100
The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro W9100 scores 7,748 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 29.9%. The FirePro W9100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (FirePro W9100) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,748 | 10,064+30% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+10% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.238 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+69% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 176+10% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB | 960 KB+36% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The FirePro W9100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W9100) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9100) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W9100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9100 draws 275W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 41.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9100) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 180W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 275mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 93 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.2 | 55.9+98% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W9100 launched at $4000 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 70% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.7 (FirePro W9100) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 333.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $249-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $60-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.7 | 167.7+333% |
| Codename | Hawaii | GP104 |
| Release | March 26 2014 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #328 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












