FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

FirePro W9100

2014Core: 930 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W9100

2014

Why buy it

  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,748 vs 10,749).
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2014 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 2266.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • +38.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $3,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3183.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 38.7% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 7,748), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,831 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $4,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3183.6% (63.6 vs 1.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W9100

The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro W9100 scores 7,748 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 38.7%. The FirePro W9100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (FirePro W9100) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
7,748
10,749+39%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2816+22%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.238 TFLOPS
6.774 TFLOPS+29%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
176+144%
72
L1 Cache
0.69 MB
2.3 MB+233%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W9100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W9100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. FirePro W9100 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9100 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W9100) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+167%
6 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+167%
96-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9100) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
12
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W9100) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder
VCE 2.0
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
UVD 4.2
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
H.264
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W9100 draws 275W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 118.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9100) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 275mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 93 vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
275W
70W-75%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
275mm
160mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
93
75°C-19%
Perf/Watt
28.2
153.6+445%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W9100 came in at $4000, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 95.8% cheaper ($3831 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (FirePro W9100) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 3247.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$4000
$169-96%
Performance per Dollar
1.9
63.6+3247%
Codename
Hawaii
GA107
Release
March 26 2014
February 2 2024
Ranking
#328
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.