FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 4060

FirePro W9100

2014Core: 930 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz

FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 4060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W9100

2014

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,748 vs 19,548).
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2014 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1237.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $4,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

  • +152.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $3,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3275.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 152.3% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 7,748), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while FirePro W9100 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,701 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $4,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3275.2% (65.4 vs 1.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W9100

The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro W9100 scores 7,748 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 152.3%. The FirePro W9100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (FirePro W9100) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060).

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 4060
G3D Mark Score
7,748
19,548+152%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2816
3072+9%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.238 TFLOPS
15.11 TFLOPS+188%
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
176+83%
96
L1 Cache
0.69 MB
3 MB+335%
L2 Cache
1 MB
24 MB+2300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro W9100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W9100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 4060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W9100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 carries 8 GB. FirePro W9100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9100 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W9100) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 4060
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
24 MB+2300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9100) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 4060
DirectX
12
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W9100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 4060
Encoder
VCE 2.0
NVENC 8th gen
Decoder
UVD 4.2
NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs
H.264
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W9100 draws 275W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 82.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9100) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 93 vs 73°C.

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 4060
TDP
275W
115W-58%
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
275mm
240mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
93
73°C-22%
Perf/Watt
28.2
170.0+503%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W9100 came in at $4000, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 92.5% cheaper ($3701 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (FirePro W9100) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 3342.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W9100GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP
$4000
$299-93%
Performance per Dollar
1.9
65.4+3342%
Codename
Hawaii
AD107
Release
March 26 2014
May 18 2023
Ranking
#328
#84

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.