FirePro W9100
Radeon RX 780
FirePro W9100 vs Radeon RX 780 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W9100 vs Radeon RX 780 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W9100 vs Radeon RX 780: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W9100
2014Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌701.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌52.8% higher power demand at 275W vs 180W.
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 692.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 275W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W9100 vs Radeon RX 780 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W9100
The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.
Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9100 scores 7,748 and the Radeon RX 780 reaches 7,658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (FirePro W9100) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,748+1% | 7,658 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 3840+36% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.238 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+585% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 176 | 240+36% |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB | 768 KB+9% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro W9100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 780 carries 4 GB. FirePro W9100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9100 and System on the Radeon RX 780. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W9100) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9100) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W9100) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9100 draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 41.8% difference. The Radeon RX 780 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9100) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 93 vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 180W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 275mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 93 | 85°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 28.2 | 42.5+51% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W9100 came in at $4000, while the Radeon RX 780 launched at $499. On MSRP, Radeon RX 780 was 87.5% cheaper ($3501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (FirePro W9100) vs 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 offers 705.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 780 (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $499-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 15.3+705% |
| Codename | Hawaii | Navi 32 |
| Release | March 26 2014 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #328 | #131 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W9100 and Radeon RX 780
