FirePro W9100 vs T1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W9100 vs T1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W9100 vs T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W9100
2014Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1042.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌450% higher power demand at 275W vs 50W.
- ❌76.3% longer card at 275mm vs 156mm.
T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,650 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1028.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 275W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 275mm, a 119mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W9100 vs T1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W9100
The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.

T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9100 scores 7,748 and the T1000 reaches 7,649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (FirePro W9100) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,748+1% | 7,649 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+214% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.238 TFLOPS+110% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 176+214% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB | 896 KB+27% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the T1000 carries 4 GB. FirePro W9100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9100 and 128-bit on the T1000.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9100) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W9100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9100 draws 275W versus the T1000's 50W — a 138.5% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9100) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 275mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 93 vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 50W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 275mm | 156mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 93 | 70°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 28.2 | 153.0+443% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W9100 came in at $4000, while the T1000 launched at $350. On MSRP, T1000 was 91.3% cheaper ($3650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (FirePro W9100) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the T1000 offers 1052.6% better value. The newer card here is T1000 (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $350-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 21.9+1053% |
| Codename | Hawaii | TU117 |
| Release | March 26 2014 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #328 | #333 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















