Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1060

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FireStream 9250

2008Core: 625 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon

FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Performance Spectrum

FireStream 9250
1 GB 150
1,165
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R5 M430
brand logoRadeon HD 4810
brand logoRadeon R7 240
brand logoRadeon HD 8570D + HD 8570 Dual
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
GeForce GTX 1060
6 GB 180
10,064
+763.9%
brand logoGeForce GTX 680
brand logoGeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce GTX 980 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FireStream 9250

2008

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,165 vs 10,064).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    301.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅+763.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 3365.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).
  • ✅FireStream 9250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 763.9% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 1,165), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $750 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3365.9% (40.4 vs 1.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FireStream 9250

The FireStream 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,165 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FireStream 9250 scores 1,165 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 763.9%. The FireStream 9250 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9250) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (FireStream 9250) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFireStream 9250GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
1,165
10,064+764%
Architecture
TeraScale
Pascal
Process Node
55 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
800
2560+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+787%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
160+300%
L1 Cache
160 KB
960 KB+500%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FireStream 9250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFireStream 9250GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FireStream 9250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9250 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FireStream 9250) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFireStream 9250GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
6 GB+500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9250) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureFireStream 9250GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
10.1
12+19%
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
OpenGL
3.3
4.5+36%
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9250) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FireStream 9250) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFireStream 9250GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
None
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
UVD 2.0
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FireStream 9250 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 18.2% difference. The FireStream 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9250) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 234mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFireStream 9250GeForce GTX 1060
TDP
150W-17%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
234mm
173mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
Unknown
—
Perf/Watt
7.8
55.9+617%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FireStream 9250 came in at $999, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 75.1% cheaper ($750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (FireStream 9250) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 3266.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2008).

FeatureFireStream 9250GeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$999
$249-75%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
40.4+3267%
Codename
RV770
GP104
Release
June 16 2008
May 27 2016
Ranking
#840
#137
Search FireStream 9250 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.