FX-4320 vs Core i3-6100TE
FX-4320
Core i3-6100TE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-4320 is positioned at rank 950 and the Core i3-6100TE is on rank 949, so the Core i3-6100TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-4320
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6100TE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-4320 | Core i3-6100TE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) | ✅ More affordable ($90) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-4320 | Core i3-6100TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+11%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) | ✅ More affordable ($90) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-4320 and Core i3-6100TE
FX-4320
The FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,150 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i3-6100TE
The Core i3-6100TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,152 points. Launch price was $117.
Processing Power
The FX-4320 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6100TE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4320 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the FX-4320 versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100TE — a 41.2% clock advantage for the FX-4320. The FX-4320 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6100TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4320 scores 3,150 against the Core i3-6100TE's 3,152 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-6100TE. L3 cache: 4096 kB on the FX-4320 vs 4 MB on the Core i3-6100TE.
| Feature | FX-4320 | Core i3-6100TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+52% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4096 kB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512 kB |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 3,150 | 3,152 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-6100TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-4320 | Core i3-6100TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-4320) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6100TE). The Core i3-6100TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the FX-4320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6100TE targets Embedded.
| Feature | FX-4320 | Core i3-6100TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 530 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Value Analysis
The FX-4320 launched at $250 MSRP, while the Core i3-6100TE debuted at $250. At current prices ($100 vs $90), the Core i3-6100TE is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4320 delivers 31.5 pts/$ vs 35.0 pts/$ for the Core i3-6100TE — making the Core i3-6100TE the 10.6% better value option.
| Feature | FX-4320 | Core i3-6100TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $90-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.5 | 35.0+11% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-4320 and Core i3-6100TE
