FX-4320 vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G

FX-4320

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2012

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2 Cores4 Thrd8 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

FX-4320

4 / 4

3,150

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2 / 4

3,142

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-4320 is positioned at rank 950 and the Ryzen Embedded R1305G is on rank 856, so the Ryzen Embedded R1305G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4320

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

24739%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

23376%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

16973%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

5113%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

4050%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

3543%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

2029%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

2003%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

1824%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

1823%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

1803%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

1754%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

1730%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

1723%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

1707%

#950

FX-4320

MSRP: $250|Avg: $100

100%

#951

Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition

MSRP: $990|Avg: $150

100%

#952

Celeron E1200

MSRP: $53|Avg: $98

100%

#954

Core i5-660

MSRP: $196|Avg: $150

99%

#955

Athlon II X2 250

MSRP: $87|Avg: $15

98%

#956

Core i3-2120T

MSRP: $127|Avg: $38

98%

#957

Phenom II X3 720

MSRP: $130|Avg: $64

98%

#958

Pentium E6300

MSRP: $84|Avg: $15

98%

#959

Core i5-661

MSRP: $196|Avg: $40

97%

#960

Core i5-750

MSRP: $210|Avg: $30

96%

#961

Core i3-4150

MSRP: $281|Avg: $70

96%

#962

Core i3-2100T

MSRP: $127|Avg: $127

96%

#963

Pentium E2210

MSRP: $84|Avg: $15

95%

#964

Core i3-560

MSRP: $138|Avg: $10

94%

#965

Core i3-550

MSRP: $138|Avg: $5

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded R1305G

#844

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1400%

#845

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1380%

#846

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1267%

#847

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1261%

#848

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1250%

#850

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1207%

#851

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1157%

#852

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1155%

#853

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1124%

#856

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

100%

#863

Pentium Dual Core T2390

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

98%

#867

Core i7-1160G7

MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R1305G (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	FX-4320	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($100)	✅ More affordable ($50)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)	✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-4320 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	FX-4320	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+99%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($100)	✅ More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

FX-4320 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Embedded R1305G Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-4320 and Ryzen Embedded R1305G

FX-4320

The FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,150 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-4320 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4320 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the FX-4320 versus 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — a 37.7% clock advantage for the FX-4320 (base: 4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The FX-4320 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4320 scores 3,150 against the Ryzen Embedded R1305G's 3,142 — a 0.3% lead for the FX-4320. L3 cache: 4096 kB on the FX-4320 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

Feature	FX-4320	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+46%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+167%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	4096 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,150	3,142

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-4320	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Socket	AM3+	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

The FX-4320 launched at $250 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G debuted at $150. At current prices ($100 vs $50), the Ryzen Embedded R1305G is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4320 delivers 31.5 pts/$ vs 62.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — making the Ryzen Embedded R1305G the 66.4% better value option.