FX-4320 vs Pentium Gold G5400T

FX-4320 vs Pentium Gold G5400T Performance Spectrum

FX-4320

4 / 4

3,150

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium Gold G5400T

2 / 4

3,156

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-4320 vs Pentium Gold G5400T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-4320 vs Pentium Gold G5400T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-4320

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,150 vs 3,156).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Pentium Gold G5400T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Pentium Gold G5400T

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Gold G5400T better than FX-4320?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-4320 is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Gold G5400T pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Gold G5400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Gold G5400T is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium Gold G5400T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. FX-4320 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (12.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium Gold G5400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-4320 vs Pentium Gold G5400T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-4320

The FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,150 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium Gold G5400T

The Pentium Gold G5400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,156 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-4320 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Gold G5400T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4320 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the FX-4320 versus 3.1 GHz on the Pentium Gold G5400T — a 27.8% clock advantage for the FX-4320 (base: 4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The FX-4320 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Gold G5400T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4320 scores 3,150 against the Pentium Gold G5400T's 3,156 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium Gold G5400T. L3 cache: 4096 kB on the FX-4320 vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium Gold G5400T.

Feature	FX-4320	Pentium Gold G5400T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+32%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+29%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4096 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	3,150	3,156

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Gold G5400T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.