Core i3-10110Y vs FX-4320

Core i3-10110Y vs FX-4320 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-10110Y

2 / 4

3,171

+0.7%

Pentium Dual Core T2390

3,150

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-10110Y vs FX-4320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-10110Y vs FX-4320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-10110Y

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

FX-4320

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,150 vs 3,171).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Core i3-10110Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-4320 better than Core i3-10110Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-4320 is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10110Y pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10110Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-4320 is the better buy right now. FX-4320 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $250 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-10110Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible UTFCBGA1377 setup, Core i3-10110Y can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10110Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-10110Y vs FX-4320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10110Y

The Core i3-10110Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,171 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-4320

The FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,150 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-10110Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4320 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4320 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i3-10110Y versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-4320 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the FX-4320 (base: 1 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i3-10110Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4320 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10110Y scores 3,171 against the FX-4320's 3,150 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-10110Y. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-10110Y vs 4096 kB on the FX-4320.

Feature	Core i3-10110Y	FX-4320
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock	1 GHz	4 GHz+300%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4096 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-Y (2019)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	3,171	3,150

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10110Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4320 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.