
FX-4350

Ryzen 7 3700X
FX-4350 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
FX-4350 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
FX-4350 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
FX-4350
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $207 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,184 vs 22,430).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +236.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 161.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 26.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌169.7% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$122 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-4350.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than FX-4350?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FX-4350 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-4350
The FX-4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,184 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The FX-4350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-4350 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The FX-4350 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the FX-4350 scores 3,184 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 150.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | FX-4350 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+17% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,184 | 22,430+604% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 504 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,289 | — |
Memory & Platform
The FX-4350 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-4350 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (FX-4350) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 970,990X,990FX (FX-4350) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | FX-4350 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-3200+71% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (FX-4350) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: FX-4350 targets Gaming.
| Feature | FX-4350 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FX-4350 was priced at $122, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($122 vs $329), FX-4350 was $207 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-4350 delivers 26.1 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 89.3% better value option.
| Feature | FX-4350 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122-63% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.1 | 68.2+161% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














