FX-6200 vs Core i3-1110G4

CPU

GPU

FX-6200

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2012

Core i3-1110G4

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

FX-6200

6 / 6

4,114

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-1110G4

2 / 4

4,160

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6200 is positioned at rank 701 and the Core i3-1110G4 is on rank 985, so the FX-6200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6200

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

12807%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

12101%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

8786%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

2647%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

2097%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

1834%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

1051%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

1037%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

944%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

944%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

933%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

908%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

896%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

892%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

884%

#391

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300

98%

#701

FX-6200

MSRP: $169|Avg: $25

100%

#702

FX-4150

MSRP: $137|Avg: $20

100%

#703

Core i5-2450P

MSRP: $177|Avg: $30

99%

#704

Core i5-4690T

MSRP: $192|Avg: $98

99%

#705

Core i5-4430S

MSRP: $182|Avg: $90

99%

#706

Core i5-4440S

MSRP: $182|Avg: $30

99%

#709

Core i3-4360T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $40

98%

#711

Core i5-3470S

MSRP: $184|Avg: $37

98%

#712

Core i5-4670T

MSRP: $189|Avg: $35

98%

#713

Core i5-2400S

MSRP: $135|Avg: $10

97%

#714

Pentium G3420

MSRP: $86|Avg: $40

97%

#715

Core i5-6500

MSRP: $239|Avg: $123

96%

#716

Core i7-4770T

MSRP: $250|Avg: $39

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-1110G4

#973

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1982%

#974

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1953%

#975

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1793%

#976

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1785%

#977

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1769%

#979

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1708%

#980

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1638%

#981

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1635%

#982

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1591%

#985

Core i3-1110G4

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#986

Pro A8-8600B

MSRP: $150|Avg: $25

99%

#991

Pentium 8500

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

98%

#992

A6-8500P

MSRP: $100|Avg: $16

98%

#994

Core i7-4700EQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $180

97%

#995

Core i3-8145UE

MSRP: $281|Avg: $50

97%

#996

Core i7-4712MQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $60

95%

#997

Core i7-3615QE

MSRP: $400|Avg: $100

95%

#998

Celeron M U3400

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

95%

#999

3015Ce

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

95%

#1000

Core i7-4700MQ

MSRP: $383|Avg: $50

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-1110G4 (2020) utilizes 10 nm SuperFin technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	FX-6200	Core i3-1110G4
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($25)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)	✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) / 10 nm SuperFin)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6200 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	FX-6200	Core i3-1110G4
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($25)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

FX-6200 Benchmark Check

Core i3-1110G4 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-6200 and Core i3-1110G4

FX-6200

The FX-6200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,114 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-1110G4

The Core i3-1110G4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,160 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-6200 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-1110G4 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6200 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the FX-6200 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1110G4 — a 5% clock advantage for the FX-6200 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The FX-6200 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-1110G4 uses Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the FX-6200 scores 4,114 against the Core i3-1110G4's 4,160 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-1110G4. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-6200 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1110G4.

Feature	FX-6200	Core i3-1110G4
Cores / Threads	6 / 6+200%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+5%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+111%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8192 kB+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	6144 kB+380%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	32 nm	10 nm SuperFin-69%
Architecture	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)
PassMark	4,114	4,160+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,491

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6200 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-1110G4 uses FCBGA1598 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-6200	Core i3-1110G4
Socket	AM3+	FCBGA1598
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	—	LPDDR4x-4267
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-6200) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1110G4). The Core i3-1110G4 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)), while the FX-6200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1110G4 targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-1110G4 rivals Ryzen 3 4300U.