FX-6200 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2

FX-6200 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 Performance Spectrum

FX-6200

6 / 6

4,114

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5-1607 v2

4 / 4

4,141

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-6200 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-6200 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-6200

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 47.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 130W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,114 vs 4,141).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-1607 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6200 better than Xeon E5-1607 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1607 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-6200 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1607 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-6200 is the better buy right now. FX-6200 comes in $81 cheaper on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1607 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 47.0% better value on MSRP (24.3 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1607 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012), 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-6200 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-6200

The FX-6200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,114 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5-1607 v2

The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-6200 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the FX-6200 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v2 — a 31% clock advantage for the FX-6200 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The FX-6200 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6200 scores 4,114 against the Xeon E5-1607 v2's 4,141 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-1607 v2. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-6200 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v2.

Feature	FX-6200	Xeon E5-1607 v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 6+50%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+37%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+27%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	8192 kB	10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	6144 kB+2300%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark	4,114	4,141

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6200 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-6200	Xeon E5-1607 v2
Socket	AM3+	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-6200 was priced at $169, while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($169 vs $250), FX-6200 was $81 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6200 delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1607 v2 — making the FX-6200 the 38% better value option.

Feature	FX-6200	Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP	$169-32%	$250
Performance per Dollar	24.3+46%	16.6
Release Date	2012	2013

Search FX-6200 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-1607 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.