FX-6200
VS
Xeon E5-1607 v2

FX-6200 vs Xeon E5-1607 v2

AMD

FX-6200

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-1607 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd130 WWMax: 3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6200 is positioned at rank 701 and the Xeon E5-1607 v2 is on rank 676, so the Xeon E5-1607 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6200

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12807%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12101%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8786%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2647%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2097%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1834%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1051%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1037%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
944%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
944%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
933%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
908%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
896%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
892%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
884%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
98%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
100%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
100%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
99%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
99%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
99%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
99%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
98%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
98%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
97%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
97%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
96%
#716
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1607 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12550%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2370%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2105%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1626%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
100%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
99%
#400
EPYC 7713P
MSRP: $5010|Avg: $2443
98%
#401
Xeon W-2145
MSRP: $1113|Avg: $145
98%
#402
EPYC 9475F
MSRP: $7592|Avg: $7592
97%
#403
Xeon Gold 6554S
MSRP: $3157|Avg: $2836
97%
#676
Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $68
100%
#678
Xeon W5590
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
100%
#683
Xeon E5-1603 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $40
99%
#684
Xeon E3-1270
MSRP: $330|Avg: $178
98%
#691
Xeon E5-1650 v2
MSRP: $583|Avg: $60
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($68) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightFX-6200Xeon E5-1607 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($68)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-E (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6200 ($25), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($43 less, 63% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightFX-6200Xeon E5-1607 v2
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+170%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($68)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-6200 and Xeon E5-1607 v2

AMD

FX-6200

The FX-6200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,114 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon E5-1607 v2

The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The FX-6200 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the FX-6200 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v2 — a 31% clock advantage for the FX-6200 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The FX-6200 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6200 scores 4,114 against the Xeon E5-1607 v2's 4,141 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-1607 v2. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-6200 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v2.

FeatureFX-6200Xeon E5-1607 v2
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+37%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+27%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB
10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
6144 kB+2300%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Zambezi (2011−2012)
Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark
4,114
4,141
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6200 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-6200Xeon E5-1607 v2
Socket
AM3+
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-6200 launched at $169 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 debuted at $250. At current prices ($25 vs $68), the FX-6200 is $43 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6200 delivers 164.6 pts/$ vs 60.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1607 v2 — making the FX-6200 the 92% better value option.

FeatureFX-6200Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP
$169-32%
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$25-63%
$68
Performance per Dollar
164.6+170%
60.9
Release Date
2012
2013