GeForce 6200 vs NVS 810
GeForce 6200
Popular choices:
NVS 810
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6200 is positioned at rank 734 and the NVS 810 is on rank 309, so the NVS 810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6200
Performance Per Dollar NVS 810
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 6200 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce 6200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The NVS 810 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The NVS 810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3121.6% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6200.
| Insight | GeForce 6200 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3121.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3121.6%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+1500%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The NVS 810 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $80 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 302.7% better value per dollar than the GeForce 6200.
| Insight | GeForce 6200 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+302.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6200 and NVS 810
GeForce 6200
The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.
NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the NVS 810's 1,192 — the NVS 810 leads by 3121.6%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 37 | 1,192+3122% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512 ×2+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+33% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32 ×2+33% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 256 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 has 4 GB. The NVS 810 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 6200) vs 1 MB (NVS 810) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 4 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 12 (12_1) (NVS 810). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 8.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12 (12_1)+33% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 8+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200) vs NVENC 5 (NVS 810). Decoder: PureVideo vs NVDEC 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200) vs H.264,H.265 (NVS 810).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 5 |
| Decoder | PureVideo | NVDEC 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 148.7% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 198mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-85% | 68W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 198mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7 | 17.5+373% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6200 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the NVS 810 launched at $700 and now averages $80. The GeForce 6200 costs 87.5% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.7 (GeForce 6200) vs 14.9 (NVS 810) — the NVS 810 offers 302.7% better value. The GeForce 6200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-82% | $700 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-88% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.7 | 14.9+303% |
| Codename | GP108B | GM107 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #643 | #826 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6200 and NVS 810
