FX-6330 vs Core i3-7101E
FX-6330
Core i3-7101E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6330 is positioned at rank 494 and the Core i3-7101E is on rank 520, so the FX-6330 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-6330
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7101E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-6330 | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-6330 | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+100%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-6330 and Core i3-7101E
FX-6330
The FX-6330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,433 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i3-7101E
The Core i3-7101E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,430 points. Launch price was $117.
Processing Power
The FX-6330 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-7101E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6330 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6330 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7101E — a 7.4% clock advantage for the FX-6330 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The FX-6330 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-7101E uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6330 scores 4,433 against the Core i3-7101E's 4,430 — a 0.1% lead for the FX-6330. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6330 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7101E.
| Feature | FX-6330 | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+200% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+8% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+167% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 4,433 | 4,430 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,250 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-6330 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-7101E uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-6330 | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (FX-6330) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7101E). The Core i3-7101E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the FX-6330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7101E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-7101E rivals Embedded Ryzen V1000.
| Feature | FX-6330 | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Value Analysis
The FX-6330 launched at $109 MSRP, while the Core i3-7101E debuted at $117. At current prices ($25 vs $50), the FX-6330 is $25 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6330 delivers 177.3 pts/$ vs 88.6 pts/$ for the Core i3-7101E — making the FX-6330 the 66.7% better value option.
| Feature | FX-6330 | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-7% | $117 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-50% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 177.3+100% | 88.6 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-6330 and Core i3-7101E
