FX-7500 vs Xeon X5560

FX-7500 vs Xeon X5560 Performance Spectrum

FX-7500

4 / 4

3,209

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X5560

4 / 8

3,231

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-7500 vs Xeon X5560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-7500 vs Xeon X5560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-7500

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 19W instead of 95W, a 76W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon X5560 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5560 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,209 vs 3,231).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5560, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Xeon X5560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X5560

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌400% higher power demand at 95W vs 19W.
❌No integrated graphics, while FX-7500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5560 better than FX-7500?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5560 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-7500 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5560 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5560 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon X5560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-7500 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 7.8% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-7500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-7500 vs Xeon X5560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-7500

The FX-7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,209 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X5560

The Xeon X5560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,231 points. Launch price was $44.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-7500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5560's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the FX-7500 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5560 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the FX-7500 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The FX-7500 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon X5560 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the FX-7500 scores 3,209 against the Xeon X5560's 3,231 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon X5560.

Feature	FX-7500	Xeon X5560
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.8 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	3,209	3,231

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-7500 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5560 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the FX-7500 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5560 — the FX-7500 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (FX-7500) vs 3 (Xeon X5560).

Feature	FX-7500	Xeon X5560
Socket	FP3	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-7500) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5560). The FX-7500 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon X5560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: FX-7500 targets Mobile, Xeon X5560 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5560 rivals Core i3-2100.