FX-7600P vs Xeon X3370

FX-7600P vs Xeon X3370 Performance Spectrum

FX-7600P

4 / 4

2,557

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X3370

2,544

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-7600P vs Xeon X3370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-7600P vs Xeon X3370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-7600P

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon X3370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X3370

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,544 vs 2,557).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-7600P better than Xeon X3370?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3370 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-7600P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-7600P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-7600P is the better buy right now. FX-7600P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X3370 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-7600P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-7600P vs Xeon X3370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-7600P

The FX-7600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,557 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X3370

The Xeon X3370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,544 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-7600P is built on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the FX-7600P scores 2,557 against the Xeon X3370's 2,544 — a 0.5% lead for the FX-7600P.

Feature	FX-7600P	Xeon X3370
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	—	12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	4096 kB	—
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	—
PassMark	2,557	2,544