Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FX-8320 vs Ryzen 7 5700X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

FX-8320

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 5700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022
Ryzen family
·······
Buy on Amazon

FX-8320 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum

FX-8320
8 / 8
5,472
0.0%
brand logoAthlon X4 830
brand logoAthlon X4 880K
brand logoRyzen Embedded R1606G
brand logoFX-8140
brand logoRyzen 7 5700
brand logoRyzen AI Max PRO 390
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Ryzen 7 5700X
8 / 16
26,609
+386.3%
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 4750U
brand logoRyzen 5 7535HS
brand logoRyzen 7 5800H
brand logoRyzen 7 7735H
brand logoRyzen AI Max PRO 390
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8320 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
FX-8320
low137 FPS
medium137 FPS
high118 FPS
ultra98 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 5700X
low156 FPS
medium129 FPS
high115 FPS
ultra94 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
FX-8320
low137 FPS
medium137 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra137 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 5700X
low649 FPS
medium549 FPS
high448 FPS
ultra404 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
FX-8320
low137 FPS
medium137 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra137 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 5700X
low665 FPS
medium557 FPS
high509 FPS
ultra439 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
FX-8320
low137 FPS
medium137 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra137 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 5700X
low665 FPS
medium665 FPS
high665 FPS
ultra665 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
FX-8320
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 5700X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
FX-8320
low137 FPS
medium137 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra137 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 5700X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
FX-8320
low137 FPS
medium137 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra137 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 5700X
low289 FPS
medium219 FPS
high191 FPS
ultra172 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
FX-8320
low137 FPS
medium137 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra127 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 5700X
low278 FPS
medium245 FPS
high191 FPS
ultra155 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
FX-8320
low137 FPS
medium137 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra137 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 5700X
low351 FPS
medium300 FPS
high259 FPS
ultra221 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
FX-8320
low137 FPS
medium137 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra123 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 5700X
low238 FPS
medium218 FPS
high185 FPS
ultra172 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

FX-8320 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8320

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (4,500 vs 14,000).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +107.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Delivers 174.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
  • ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌
    76.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $299 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8320.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than FX-8320?
Yes. Ryzen 7 5700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 107.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 211.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 386.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 107.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 211.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 5700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 5700X comes in 76.9% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you a 107.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 174.9% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 32.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 5700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-8320 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FX-8320

The FX-8320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,472 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8320 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 5700X's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-8320 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 14% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The FX-8320 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8320 scores 5,472 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 131.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 4,500 vs 14,000 (102.7% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 458 vs 2,116, a 128.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,791 vs 9,715 (137.7% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X).

FeatureFX-8320Ryzen 7 5700X
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.6 GHz+15%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+3%
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
—
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8192 kB+1500%
512K (per core)
Process
32 nm
7 nm-78%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark
5,472
26,609+386%
Cinebench R23 Multi
4,500
14,000+211%
Geekbench 6 Single
458
2,116+362%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,791
9,715+442%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8320 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-8320 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the Ryzen 7 5700X supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (FX-8320) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 970,990X,990FX (FX-8320) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).

FeatureFX-8320Ryzen 7 5700X
Socket
AM3+
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-3200+71%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
128 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
24+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: FX-8320 targets Productivity, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: FX-8320 rivals Core i5-3570; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

FeatureFX-8320Ryzen 7 5700X
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Productivity
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-8320 was priced at $169, while the Ryzen 7 5700X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($169 vs $299), FX-8320 was $130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8320 delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 93.3% better value option.

FeatureFX-8320Ryzen 7 5700X
MSRP
$169-43%
$299
Performance per Dollar
32.4
89.0+175%
Release Date
2012
2022
Search FX-8320 on AmazonSearch Ryzen 7 5700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.