FX-8350 vs Ryzen Embedded R2314

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8350 vs Ryzen Embedded R2314 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8350 vs Ryzen Embedded R2314: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8350

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.8 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded R2314

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,850 vs 5,936).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8350 better than Ryzen Embedded R2314?

Yes. FX-8350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 35.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 35.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8350 is the better buy right now. FX-8350 comes in $101 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 35.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 53.0% better value on MSRP (29.8 vs 19.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2314 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-8350 vs Ryzen Embedded R2314 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8350

The FX-8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,936 points. Launch price was $199.

Ryzen Embedded R2314

The Ryzen Embedded R2314 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 June 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,850 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8350 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8350 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-8350 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2314 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the FX-8350 (base: 4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The FX-8350 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8350 scores 5,936 against the Ryzen Embedded R2314's 5,850 — a 1.5% lead for the FX-8350.

Feature	FX-8350	Ryzen Embedded R2314
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+20%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+90%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+1500%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	12 nm-63%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	5,936+1%	5,850

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8350 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-8350	Ryzen Embedded R2314
Socket	AM3+	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-8350 was priced at $199, while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 came in at $300. On launch pricing ($199 vs $300), FX-8350 was $101 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8350 delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R2314 — making the FX-8350 the 41.9% better value option.

Feature	FX-8350	Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP	$199-34%	$300
Performance per Dollar	29.8+53%	19.5
Release Date	2012	2022

Search FX-8350 on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded R2314 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.