FX-8350 vs Xeon E-2104G

FX-8350 vs Xeon E-2104G Performance Spectrum

FX-8350

8 / 8

5,936

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E-2104G

4 / 4

5,858

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8350 vs Xeon E-2104G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8350 vs Xeon E-2104G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8350

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌
3.1% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$193 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Xeon E-2104G

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,858 vs 5,936).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8350 better than Xeon E-2104G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2104G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8350 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 35.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8350 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E-2104G is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. FX-8350 comes in 3.1% more expensive on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 35.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E-2104G is also 1.8% better value on MSRP (30.4 vs 29.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2104G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-8350 vs Xeon E-2104G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8350

The FX-8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,936 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E-2104G

The Xeon E-2104G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 5,858 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8350 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2104G offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8350 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-8350 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2104G — a 27% clock advantage for the FX-8350 (base: 4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The FX-8350 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E-2104G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8350 scores 5,936 against the Xeon E-2104G's 5,858 — a 1.3% lead for the FX-8350.

Feature	FX-8350	Xeon E-2104G
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+31%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+25%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+3100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
PassMark	5,936+1%	5,858

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8350 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E-2104G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-8350	Xeon E-2104G
Socket	AM3+	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-8350 was priced at $199, while the Xeon E-2104G came in at $193. On launch pricing ($199 vs $193), Xeon E-2104G was $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8350 delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2104G — making the Xeon E-2104G the 1.7% better value option.

Feature	FX-8350	Xeon E-2104G
MSRP	$199	$193-3%
Performance per Dollar	29.8	30.4+2%
Release Date	2012	2018

Search FX-8350 on Amazon

Search Xeon E-2104G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.