
FX-9800P vs Pentium G3470

FX-9800P

Pentium G3470
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-9800P is positioned at rank 949 and the Pentium G3470 is on rank 877, so the Pentium G3470 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-9800P
Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3470
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-9800P | Pentium G3470 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($130) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-9800P | Pentium G3470 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+190%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($45) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($130) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-9800P and Pentium G3470

FX-9800P
The FX-9800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G3470
The Pentium G3470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,448 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The FX-9800P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G3470 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the FX-9800P has 2 more cores. The FX-9800P is built on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the FX-9800P scores 2,460 against the Pentium G3470's 2,448 — a 0.5% lead for the FX-9800P.
| Feature | FX-9800P | Pentium G3470 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per module) | — |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 2,460 | 2,448 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-9800P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G3470 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-9800P | Pentium G3470 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The FX-9800P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Pentium G3470 debuted at $150. At current prices ($45 vs $130), the FX-9800P is $85 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-9800P delivers 54.7 pts/$ vs 18.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G3470 — making the FX-9800P the 97.5% better value option.
| Feature | FX-9800P | Pentium G3470 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-65% | $130 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.7+191% | 18.8 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















