GeForce 310
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
GeForce 310 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 310 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 310 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 310
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌8.9% HIGHER MSRP$49 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 310 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 310
The GeForce 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 310 scores 143 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 reaches 140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310 is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 310) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3650).
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 143+2% | 140 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+55% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+140% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 310 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 3650 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 310 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 carries 1 GB. Mobility Radeon HD 3650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3650. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 310) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) — the GeForce 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 310) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 310) vs UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 310 draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3650's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3650). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-34% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3+54% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 310 came in at $45, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 launched at $49. On MSRP, GeForce 310 was 8.2% cheaper ($4 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 310) vs 2.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 3650) — the GeForce 310 offers 10.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 310 (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 310 | Mobility Radeon HD 3650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45-8% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2+10% | 2.9 |
| Codename | GM108 | Broadway |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #810 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 310 and Mobility Radeon HD 3650
