GeForce 310 vs Radeon HD 6290M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 310 vs Radeon HD 6290M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 310 vs Radeon HD 6290M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 310

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6290M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6290M

2011

Why buy it

✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6290M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 310 instead at 143 vs 140, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 310 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6290M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 310 vs Radeon HD 6290M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 310

The GeForce 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points.

Radeon HD 6290M

The Radeon HD 6290M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 310 scores 143 and the Radeon HD 6290M reaches 140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 310 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6290M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 310) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6290M). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 310) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6290M).

Feature	GeForce 310	Radeon HD 6290M
G3D Mark Score	143+2%	140
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	960+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+81%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	48+100%
L1 Cache	192 KB	192 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 310 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6290M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 310	Radeon HD 6290M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 310 and System on the Radeon HD 6290M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 310) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6290M) — the GeForce 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 310	Radeon HD 6290M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 310 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6290M's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 310) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 310	Radeon HD 6290M
TDP	33W-56%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.3+126%	1.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 310 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce 310	Radeon HD 6290M
MSRP	$45	—
Codename	GM108	Blackcomb
Release	March 13 2015	January 4 2011
Ranking	#810	#654

Search GeForce 310 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6290M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.