
GeForce 315

GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 315 vs GeForce 7950 GX2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 315 vs GeForce 7950 GX2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 315 vs GeForce 7950 GX2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 315
2020Why buy it
- ✅GeForce 7950 GX2 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 315 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 23W, a 3W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 7950 GX2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce 7950 GX2
2016Why buy it
- ✅20.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌15% higher power demand at 23W vs 20W.
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 315 vs GeForce 7950 GX2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 315
The GeForce 315 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 196 points.

GeForce 7950 GX2
The GeForce 7950 GX2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 202 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 315 scores 196 and the GeForce 7950 GX2 reaches 202 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 315 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 7950 GX2 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 315) vs 512 (GeForce 7950 GX2). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce 315) vs 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 7950 GX2). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 861 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce 7950 GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 196 | 202+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS+36% | 0.8817 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 937 MHz+9% | 861 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 256 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce 7950 GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 315 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7950 GX2 carries 1 GB. GeForce 7950 GX2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 315 and 128-bit on the GeForce 7950 GX2. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 315) vs 1 MB (GeForce 7950 GX2) — the GeForce 7950 GX2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce 7950 GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 315) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7950 GX2). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce 7950 GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 315) vs None (GeForce 7950 GX2). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD (VP1). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 315) vs H.264,MPEG-2,WMV (GeForce 7950 GX2).
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce 7950 GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo HD (VP1) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,MPEG-2,WMV |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 315 draws 20W versus the GeForce 7950 GX2's 23W — a 14% difference. The GeForce 315 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 315) vs 350W (GeForce 7950 GX2). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce 7950 GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-13% | 23W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.8+11% | 8.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 315 came in at $0, while the GeForce 7950 GX2 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce 315 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 315) vs 0.3 (GeForce 7950 GX2) — the GeForce 315 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 315 (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce 7950 GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.3 |
| Codename | GP107 | GM107 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | June 28 2016 |
| Ranking | #597 | #764 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














