GeForce 315 vs GeForce 7950 GX2

NVIDIA

GeForce 315

2020Core: 747 MHzBoost: 937 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 7950 GX2

2016Core: 795 MHzBoost: 861 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 315 vs GeForce 7950 GX2 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 315 vs GeForce 7950 GX2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 315 vs GeForce 7950 GX2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 315

2020

Why buy it

  • GeForce 7950 GX2 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 315 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 20W instead of 23W, a 3W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 7950 GX2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce 7950 GX2

2016

Why buy it

  • 20.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 15% higher power demand at 23W vs 20W.
  • 36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 7950 GX2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (202 vs 196), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 315 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 7950 GX2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 7950 GX2 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 315 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 315 vs GeForce 7950 GX2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 315

The GeForce 315 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 196 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 7950 GX2

The GeForce 7950 GX2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 202 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 315 scores 196 and the GeForce 7950 GX2 reaches 202 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 315 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 7950 GX2 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 315) vs 512 (GeForce 7950 GX2). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce 315) vs 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 7950 GX2). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 861 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 315GeForce 7950 GX2
G3D Mark Score
196
202+3%
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+25%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.199 TFLOPS+36%
0.8817 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
937 MHz+9%
861 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
240 KB
256 KB+7%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 315GeForce 7950 GX2
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 315 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7950 GX2 carries 1 GB. GeForce 7950 GX2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 315 and 128-bit on the GeForce 7950 GX2. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 315) vs 1 MB (GeForce 7950 GX2) — the GeForce 7950 GX2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 315GeForce 7950 GX2
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 315) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7950 GX2). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 315GeForce 7950 GX2
DirectX
10.1+12%
9.0c
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 315) vs None (GeForce 7950 GX2). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD (VP1). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 315) vs H.264,MPEG-2,WMV (GeForce 7950 GX2).

FeatureGeForce 315GeForce 7950 GX2
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD (VP1)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
H.264,MPEG-2,WMV
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 315 draws 20W versus the GeForce 7950 GX2's 23W — a 14% difference. The GeForce 315 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 315) vs 350W (GeForce 7950 GX2). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce 315GeForce 7950 GX2
TDP
20W-13%
23W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85
Perf/Watt
9.8+11%
8.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 315 came in at $0, while the GeForce 7950 GX2 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce 315 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 315) vs 0.3 (GeForce 7950 GX2) — the GeForce 315 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 315 (2020 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce 315GeForce 7950 GX2
MSRP
$0-100%
$599
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.3
Codename
GP107
GM107
Release
February 10 2020
June 28 2016
Ranking
#597
#764

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.