
GeForce 315

GeForce Go 7800 GTX
GeForce 315 vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 315 vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 315 vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 315
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅GeForce Go 7800 GTX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 315 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 250W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7800 GTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce Go 7800 GTX
2013Why buy it
- ✅30.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1150% higher power demand at 250W vs 20W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 315 vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 315
The GeForce 315 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 196 points.

GeForce Go 7800 GTX
The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 315 scores 196 versus the GeForce Go 7800 GTX's 210 — the GeForce Go 7800 GTX leads by 7.1%. The GeForce 315 is built on Pascal while the GeForce Go 7800 GTX uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 315) vs 2,880 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce 315) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 928 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce Go 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 196 | 210+7% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2880+350% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS | 5.345 TFLOPS+346% |
| Boost Clock | 937 MHz | 928 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 240+650% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce Go 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 315 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7800 GTX carries 256 MB. GeForce 315 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 315 and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7800 GTX. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 315) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) — the GeForce Go 7800 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce Go 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 315) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce Go 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 315) vs No (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 315) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX).
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce Go 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 315 draws 20W versus the GeForce Go 7800 GTX's 250W — a 170.4% difference. The GeForce 315 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 315) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce Go 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-92% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.8+1125% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 315 (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 315 | GeForce Go 7800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | GP107 | GK110B |
| Release | February 10 2020 | November 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #597 | #278 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














