
GeForce 315 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

GeForce 315
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 315 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2009). The GeForce 315 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 315 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT.
| Insight | GeForce 315 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 315 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 315 and Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

GeForce 315
The GeForce 315 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 196 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 192 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 315 scores 196 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT reaches 192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 315 is built on Pascal while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 315) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce 315) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT).
| Feature | GeForce 315 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 196+2% | 192 |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800 ×2+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS+36% | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40 ×2+25% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+50% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 315 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 315 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT has 256 MB. The GeForce 315 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 315) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the GeForce 315 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 315 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 315) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 315 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 315) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs Avivo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 315) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT).
| Feature | GeForce 315 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | Avivo HD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 315 draws 20W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT's 30W — a 40% difference. The GeForce 315 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 315) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 315 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-33% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.8+53% | 6.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 315 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT launched at $199 and now averages $12. The GeForce 315 costs 100+% less ($12 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce 315) vs 16.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the GeForce 315 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 315 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 315 | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $12 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 16.0 |
| Codename | GP107 | M98 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #597 | #818 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















