GeForce 505 vs FirePro 2270
GeForce 505
Popular choices:
FirePro 2270
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 505 is positioned at rank 674 and the FirePro 2270 is on rank 352, so the FirePro 2270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 505
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 2270
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 505 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The GeForce 505 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 2270 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 505 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 2270 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 505 | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 505 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $30 for the FirePro 2270, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 102.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 505 | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+102.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 505 and FirePro 2270
GeForce 505
The GeForce 505 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.
FirePro 2270
The FirePro 2270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 142 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 505 scores 144 and the FirePro 2270 reaches 142 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 505 is built on Ampere while the FirePro 2270 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce 505) vs 2,048 (FirePro 2270). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 505) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 2270).
| Feature | GeForce 505 | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 144+1% | 142 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+36% | 3.482 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 505 | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 505 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 2270 has 1 GB. The FirePro 2270 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 505) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro 2270) — the GeForce 505 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 505) vs 11 (FirePro 2270). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11+9% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 505) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2270). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 505) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2270).
| Feature | GeForce 505 | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 505 draws 25W versus the FirePro 2270's 274W — a 166.6% difference. The GeForce 505 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 505) vs 350W (FirePro 2270). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce 505 | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-91% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 170mm |
| Height | 64mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 60°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8+1060% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 505 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the FirePro 2270 launched at $149 and now averages $30. The GeForce 505 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (GeForce 505) vs 4.7 (FirePro 2270) — the GeForce 505 offers 104.3% better value. The GeForce 505 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 505 | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-34% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-50% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6+104% | 4.7 |
| Codename | GA107 | Tahiti |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #407 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 505 and FirePro 2270
