CPU
GPU
GeForce 6800
Popular choices:
GeForce 9300M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6800 is positioned at rank 726 and the GeForce 9300M GS is on rank 686, so the GeForce 9300M GS offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9300M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6800.
| Insight | GeForce 6800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9300M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9300M GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $50), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 422.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+422.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6800 and GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 6800
The GeForce 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points.
GeForce 9300M GS
The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6800 scores 113 and the GeForce 9300M GS reaches 118 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6800 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9300M GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 6800) vs 384 (GeForce 9300M GS). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 6800) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 549 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 113 | 118+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS+40% | 0.4216 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+109% | 549 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6800) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9300M GS). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 6800) vs No (GeForce 9300M GS). Decoder: PureVideo (VP1) vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV (GeForce 6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M GS).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo (VP1) | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6800 draws 33W versus the GeForce 9300M GS's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6800) vs 350W (GeForce 9300M GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 198mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 198mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.4 | 3.6+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6800 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce 9300M GS launched at $100 and now averages $10. The GeForce 9300M GS costs 80% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (GeForce 6800) vs 11.8 (GeForce 9300M GS) — the GeForce 9300M GS offers 413% better value. The GeForce 9300M GS is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 6800 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $100-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $10-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | 11.8+413% |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #832 | #880 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6800 and GeForce 9300M GS
